Archive

quotes

“Much of a drug response is related to nonspecific factors. Perceptual characteristics of drug preparations likely play a major role in expectancy and response. This study focused on perceptual characteristics of a preparation related to anticipated effect: capsule color, capsule size, and preparation form (capsule versus tablet). College students ranked capsules for perceived strength based on capsule size, categorized capsules in terms of anticipated pharmacological effect based on color, and evaluated strength based on preparation form. Data showed nonchance distributions for nine capsule colors in anticipated action, with specific effects for four colors. A significant difference between capsule and tablet for perceived strength was found, as was a trend relating capsule size to perceived drug strength. Discussion centered on awareness and consideration of drug perceptual characteristics in support of drug efficacy.”

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1982 Aug;2(4):245-8.
An investigation of drug expectancy as a function of capsule color and size and preparation form.
Buckalew LW, Coffield KE.

“There is accumulating evidence from different methodological approaches that the placebo effect is a neurobiological phenomenon. Behavioral, psychophysiological, and neuroimaging results have largely contributed to accepting the placebo response as real. A major aspect of recent and future advances in placebo research is to demonstrate linkages between behavior, brain, and bodily responses. This article provides an overview of the processes involved in the formation of placebo responses by combining research findings from behavioral, psychophysiological, and neuroimaging methods. The integration of these different methodological approaches is a key objective, motivating our scientific pursuits toward a placebo research that can inform and guide important future scientific knowledge.”

The Placebo Effect: Advances from Different Methodological Approaches
Karin Meissner1,2,*, Ulrike Bingel3,*, Luana Colloca4,5,*, Tor D. Wager6,*, Alison Watson7,*, and Magne Arve Flaten8,*

The Journal of Neuroscience, 9 November 2011, 31(45): 16117-16124

How will you go about finding that thing the nature of which is totally unknown to you?

Meno, from Plato’s dialogue (in Solnit, 2005)

R. Solnit, A Field Guide to Getting Lost (2005)

Susan Stewart, “On Longing”

p.134-5
the souvenir [object] both offers a measure for the normal and authenticates the experience of the viewer

p.151
The souvenir involved the displacement of attention into the past. (…) its function is to envelop the present with the past. Souvenirs are magical objects because of this transformation. Yet the magic of the souvenir is a kind of failed magic. Instrumentality replaces essence here as it does in the case of all magical objects, but this instrumentality always works on only partial transformation. The place of origin must remain unavailable in order for desire to be generated.

wyndham lewis. in manifesto – a century of isms
“bless all seafarers. the exchange not one land for another, but one element for another. the more against the less abstract. “

Oppenheimer: “scientists live always at the ‘edge of mystery’ – the boundary of the unknown. “
Rebecca Solnit, a field guide to getting lost: “scientist transform the unknown into the known, haul it in like fishermen; artist get you out into that dark sea.“

“Let me suggest the beginning toward some resolution of this problem of two cultures by turning to the thoughts of Robert Oppenheimer, one of my most distinguished predecessors as director of the Institute for Advanced Study. Four years before C P Snow’s lecture, Oppenheimer gave a lecture about two cultures; he used the categories of scientist and artist. He concluded that both scientists and artists had become highly specialized, isolated, and to some extent irrelevant to society. And he, like Snow, suggested that both groups expose themselves to other people – both to teach and to learn from those around them. The purpose of this exposure is not to dilute their own efforts, or to take orders from those who do not understand what they are doing. The proper role of scientists and artists, he said, is to “not merely find new truth and communicate it to his fellows, but that he teach, that he try to bring the most honest and intelligible account of new knowledge to all who will try to learn.” This teaching, when successful, is the first set of girders across the gulf between the two cultures. “
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Griffiths_two_cultures.html